Written while giving final exams
after the summer session at Middlebury College, 1962. “Air with thought thick,
air scratched.” The room had exposed rafters and a stage, and B. was sitting on
it, writing away while his students wrote their exams. One student—Mr. Torrey,
who makes an appearance—remembers looking up at him on the stage, and every
time he looked up, B. was staring at him, and then would wave at him.
kindly
arising from creaking bodies, from
my
hundreds braining & self-burdensome
yawning
down there, catching their breath.
B.’s wife, Kate, was pregnant, he
was suffering from bouts of delirium tremens, he obsessively chain-smoked
Tareytons non-stop, and he obsessively chain-wrote Dream Songs. He insulted
about half of the faculty. His teaching that summer was universally regarded as
brilliant, the talk of the school—brilliant, theatrical and passionate.
It occurs to me—probably late in the
game—that Dream Songs are sometimes meant to be disposed of. I have a
resistance to this, partly because when we study literature we go to the
classics, which almost by definition are durable, relevant through the ages,
timeless, lasting—classic. Big prizes cement the work’s reputation, the Nobel,
the Pulitzer, the Man Booker, the National Book Award. B. won two of these with
his two volumes of Dream Songs, so that helps solidify them. I came to them
expecting gravitas and wisdom. But the story of him, on a stage, smoking like a
furnace, waving at his students as he wrote a poem about them, writing a Dream
Song as busily as they’re writing their exams—I begin to see that the product
isn’t really the point. It’s the process. He just does it. It’s just what he
does. There is the responsibility to send them out, gather them into a book, go
through the publishing routine, because that’s all expected of someone who
makes his living writing and teaching literature. But that was ancillary to the
real project. Smoke, drink, write, chase women, the product of it all is not
important. It was the moment of writing that defined who he was. He needed it
like he needed cigarettes, and like he was addicted to scotch and bourbon. That
had to be the focus, the core. Reputation followed later, but he knew that head
down, pushing the pencil, was the only way forward. But it wasn’t even that.
There was not a forward, only a timeless, sick and driven meditation.
I go into art museums sometimes
and I get astonished at some of the modern and postmodern work you can find
there characterized by repetition. There is, or was, a piece in the IU art
museum in Bloomington: Springs, probably nothing more than common toy Slinkys,
about 30 of them, suspended from the ceiling. Each one is wrapped in miles of
red thread, so that they’re an inch thick. Somebody sat in a chair and wrapped
red yarn around a Slinky for unimaginable, mind-boggling stretches of blank
time. Or, in the Ripley’s Believe-It-or-Not museum, in Daytona Beach Florida or
some such place, which I visited when I was about 10 with my family, there was
a 300-foot wooden chain carved by some OCD craftsman out of the trunk of an oak
tree, done with a pen knife. I used to sit it my desk when I was a young
teenager, with inch-high lead soldiers, painting them, one after another, all
the same, and sell them or give them to my friends who were into war gaming
with the little figures. They would line them up on tables, measure their
movements with rulers and lengths of string, and they would fight intricately
calculated stop-motion battles with charts and tables, and dice. Actually playing
these games always bored me miserably, so I rarely played them myself, though I
liked the look of the games, like vast miniature dioramas—blue and gray for the
Civil War, royal blue and redcoats for the Napoleonic wars, and so on. I
painted thousands of them, a meditative craft that I would get lost in. The
best were the mounted knights for the Medieval games, which provided a bit more
creativity. Each one was unique in color and pattern, but all on the same lead
horse, with the same stiff lead arm holding its little brittle sword aloft. The
impulse that had me painting clever variations on the same pattern (heraldic knights
with shields, on horses) is the same one that had B. writing like he did. For
me, I have memories of some of the knights, and it cemented the bond with a few
close, nerdy friends. No famous prizes, but that was never the point. It was
just something I did. I didn’t drink or smoke Tareytons, but I did listen to
music—Elton John and Queen, mainly—and while the paint fumes were probably not
good for me, they didn’t kill me either. Once the figures were given away, they
were gone. I just did more of them, and gave those away too. They made my
friends respect me within the closed, uber-dorky basement war-gamer set, and
that was the only recognition I needed.
Disposable. Good reminder.
ReplyDelete