The high heroine is back! “Cold & golden lay the high
heroine / in a wilderness of bears” is a line repeated from DS 291, so these
two poems are thematically linked. In my response to DS 291, I wrote that “The
golden heroine is possibly a symbolic representation of his wife, Kate, but
there are other possibilities, which may include his genius or his muse, or a
more generalized female figure standing for Woman, his mother, or possibly even
his anima, an embodiment of the male psyche’s collected female characteristics.”
In DS 291, she is surrounded by bears, which, whatever they may stand for in
the poem’s dream symbology, are terrifying. Had the speaker of DS 291 known
that the heroine was dead, he would have fled from whatever it is she really
symbolizes—I read her at this point as something like a female personification
of Great Art as much as anything, and the bears are the phalanx of violently ignorant
readers and critics standing between the striving artist and his union with Her,
which would be the eroticized fulfillment of his artistic goal. In DS 372, she
is mortally wounded, and this changes things. She will lie in peace, guarded by
a hound, until her lover comes, restoring her goddess-like dominion over the
life of the earth. “Her patience is exemplary” is a witty pronouncement. She’s
dead. Of course she’s patient! But the presence of her lover will bring her
back to life once he arrives.
The poet himself is the lover she’s waiting for, of course,
which would have this intolerable overtone of infantile, narcissistic grandiosity
except that this is all clearly from a dream, and stuff like this in a dream is
normal and perfectly fine. There is the critical difference between this and DS
291. There, he would run from her if she were dead. She’s not, but she’s
protected by those bears. After the lines repeated in both poems, in 291 comes,
“His spirit fled.” Here: “Let one man in.” He’s the man. One is enough. Don’t
hide away in some citadel. (Note that she’s restored to activity again somehow,
but this is a dream. That’s okay.) And then this: It’s a matter of love.
Oh my! In my effort to figure out who the mythic heroine in
DS 291 might stand for, I considered she might somehow be his wife. I really think
now that’s not the case, unless in some weird buried corner of his psyche he
married her and set her up as some kind of living embodiment of his eroticized
artistic fantasy. But I think not. In this dream, the supplication is to let
the high goddess of Great Art let him in, as a lover. It’s not really about
love, but there is a clear implication which fits right into the other
movements that have been developing: His heart is saved for his art, for Art.
No mere woman, even his wife, takes precedence over the subject’s erotic
striving toward a mythic grandiosity. This would have a fragrance of insanity
about it, but again, it’s a dream. Dreams are always insane anyway. But when
you couple this grandiosity with the undeniable effects of the soul withdrawing
and withering from addiction, you get that now-familiar manic/depressed psychic
double exposure: Grandiose and abject at the same time. Dying and immortal. Up ahead and back there,
but not here. A revealing dream indeed.
The language in this one's just beautiful, dense, begging the reread.
ReplyDelete"It's a matter of love" just kills me though.
Delete