when the man you fear most in the
world marries your mother
and chilling other,
men from far tribes armed in the
dark, the dike-
hole, the sudden gash of an old
friend’s betrayal,
words that leave one pale,
milk & honey in the old
house, mouth gone bad,
the caress that felt like all the
world for a blow,
screams of fear eyeless,
wide-eyed loss,
hellish vaudeville turns,
promises had
& promises forgotten here
below,
the final wound of the Cross.
I have a story to tell you which
is the worst
story to tell that ever once I
heard.
What thickens my tongue?
and has me by the throat? I gasp
accursed
even for the thought of uttering
that word.
I pass to the next song:
Well: Have a nice friggin’ day,
huh? J.
I’ve been talking about something
this poem brings up from several different angles lately. I was talking with my
wife about this kind of thing. I told her, you guys get on me for being cynical
sometimes, but wheedling and complaining a little bit for me is the opposite of
being cynical. It means there is still hope in my heart that things can change,
be better than they are, that they can improve, and from that standpoint, complaining
is a way of isolating that which needs to be changed—the first step toward
action, and that action is prompted by hope, and by faith that people who step
up, set goals, organize into communities, that these people can make change,
make progress happen. The opposite is to slow down, come to a stop (sin is a
lack of motion), and not care any longer. You just quietly fade away—don’t take
care of yourself, smoke too much, have out-of-body experiences that substitute for
engaging with life on this planet, dry yourself out until you turn into a
two-legged piece of ambient beef jerky. Maybe not even aware of what’s
happening. I talked about hope and despair in a meeting today, with the
Environmental Action Committee, when we sidetracked a bit from the immediate
issues at hand into a discussion of hope, engagement, and anti-environmental
propaganda. The Pope is due out tomorrow with a Papal Encyclical, where he
intends to push for worldwide recognition of climate change as a moral
imperative. His timing is deliberate, with three major conferences arriving
this year addressing climate change and its impact on disempowered,
disenfranchised people around the world. The pushback against such
revolutionary discussions, that threaten the established world economic and
energy paradigms, have been effective, concerted, and in sum, monstrous. The
propaganda of the status-quo would tell us that all is fine, the reality on the
ground, and from voices in science, is that things are bad and getting worse.
The overall effect of these discordant messages is confusion, which leads to
despair, finally to apathy, which was the goal all along. When apathy gets
established then a question arises, about life in general and about one’s life
in particular. What’s the point anymore? and the follow up, Why even live? Why
bother staying alive? Why not just commit suicide?
That’s the word the poet here dares not mention, I believe. Suicide. There are
ways to end oneself that don’t necessarily have to end one’s life, like a
gunshot or jumping off a bridge. You can just meekly check out. Also a kind of
suicide.
So, is this poem a result of
engagement or apathy? Engagement in that naming the problem is the first step
toward a solution of it. Apathy in that perhaps it’s one last utterance from an
overwhelmed psyche, listing the all the reasons that one need not bother anymore.
It’s too much.
It’s hard to say, except that the
poet was still writing, at least, and was still alive. That’s an engagement
with life. But it’s also possible to imagine some future audience, or some kind
of abstract posterity, offer it a suicide note, a goodbye cruel world
statement, and by the way—a middle finger a round “fuck you”—then check out.
Clearly, that’s what is approaching. Maybe he’s not quite there yet. By not
naming the word, the final acceptance of despair, he’s still being motivated by
hope, even if it’s tenuous grasping at a straw to try and keep himself afloat
in the maelstrom of existential muck he lists so clearly.
In the meeting today, once we
discussed propaganda, we talked about grief. The old paradigm, folks, is dying
before our eyes: The rhetoric is bankrupt, we’re running out of oil, our
political system is awash in corruption, people are suffering and dying out of
sight of power, or worse, in sight of it and under its contempt. The climate is
changing because we haven’t cared, and that’s because we’ve been told not to
care. That has led to apathy, a sense of powerlessness, disenfranchisement.
But the apathy is being
challenged by activity, organization, communities asserting themselves. We had
a ceremony on my campus where we grieved what was being lost. The integrity of
the ecological world is unraveling, but also the dominant paradigm—late capitalism—is
unravelling too, and that also causes grief. The list of landscapes, species,
communities being lost is frightening. The impending loss of what we know is
frightening. But moving through that, for all of us who were there that day,
has been uplifting. In acting, organizing, making change, speaking out, we’re
finding a lot of reason for hope, grounded in the approaching changes. But it
has come through a spirit of cooperation, of humility in league with other
humble members of a community. You’re not alone, and you’re for sure not some
rugged individualist overcoming all challenges, and if you think you are, that’s
your ego speaking. Go ahead, be brilliant, get famous, Big Shot. The massive violences
of the failing dominant paradigm and its lying propaganda will overwhelm your
ego. Depend on it. It will reduce you to apathetic whining. Is that what’s
happening here? The absence of forward-looking hope is disturbing, for sure.
But I’m an optimist now, now that I’ve faced our collective grief. I’m not
ready yet to give up in this particular instance, this poem that records one
man’s moment of negativity that threatens to overwhelm him. The word that despair leads to is holding off
for now, and that means that the speaker hasn’t succumbed to despair. Yet.
Hamlet was nearly overcome with despair, but in confronting all that business with his mother, he freed himself well enough to get killed honestly. There are references to Hamlet in this poem, especially if one reads the list of the world's ills as being inspired, at least partly, by personal incidents--generally the smart choice with B. In the end, it still seems to me like a pretty outsized ego doing the comparisons, even if he was wrestling all his life with why his father died and wondering what role his mother had in it all.
Hamlet was nearly overcome with despair, but in confronting all that business with his mother, he freed himself well enough to get killed honestly. There are references to Hamlet in this poem, especially if one reads the list of the world's ills as being inspired, at least partly, by personal incidents--generally the smart choice with B. In the end, it still seems to me like a pretty outsized ego doing the comparisons, even if he was wrestling all his life with why his father died and wondering what role his mother had in it all.
No comments:
Post a Comment