(Scene: Leningrad, the trials of the young
poet Joseph Brodsky for ‘parasitism.’ The judge’s name deserves record: one Mme
Saveleva. Let her be remembered.)
Henry rushes not in here. The
matter’s their matter,
and Hart Crane drowned himself
some over money,
but it is Henry’s mutter
that seldom has a judge so coarse
borne herself so coarsely
and often has a poet worked so
hard for so small
but they was not prosecuted
in this world. It’s Henry’s
matter, after all,
who is ashamed of much of the
Soviet world
in their odium of imagination.
Translated not just Pole but
Serbian
(a tough one, pal—vreme, vatre,
vrtovi)
& Cuban: O a bevy!
They flocked to him like women,
languages.
Bees honey but wound—African worst—Pasternak
bees,
whom they dared not to touch
though after they ruin his
friend, like this young man
who only wanted to walk beside
the canals
talking about poetry and make it.
They all vary in their cultural
details according to common underlying themes, authoritarians. Stalin and all
the Communists, Mussolini, Hitler and the Fascists, King Henry the 8th
and a whole long list of numbered historical monarchs worldwide, a long, sordid
litany of African, Latin American, Asian dictators in smaller countries. There
are CEOs in this our own proud nation who rose to their positions through
analogous pathologies, and give just as few shits about the people they ruin in
the construction and safeguarding and application of their wealth, privilege,
and power. They can’t do it alone. They all had/have politicians, bureaucrats,
judges, managers, in some cases clergy, in many cases police and military, who
take care of the finer details of the work. Censoring opposition is a
time-honored tactic, and if you believe George Orwell in 1984, it is one of the very raisons
d’être of tyranny,
the thing the tyrant and his subordinate tyrants most live for and find
satisfying. It’s not just a means to an end, it’s the end in itself, the
application of power that justifies having power, power’s mean and dangerous point. I have no doubt whatsoever that some
of the meanness we see in contemporary American life and politics follows from
the same dictates—education “reform” at all levels, privatized prisons that
create a market for human beings, the attacks on women and minorities, the
squandering of environmental resources, the removal of the social safety net
for the poor—money is the root cause, the movement of wealth upward to the
rapacious powerful few whose satisfaction comes not in the having but in the
acquiring. The satisfaction of exerting power and suffering through the
cultural structures already in place appears to have an enormous satisfaction
for certain well-placed, outwardly elegant psychopaths, who in this country
wear fine dark wool suits and who communicate through the fabric of their suits
and the color and pattern of their ties, like birds of paradise in the esoteric
but finely specific details of their mating plumage. Honest words would be
clumsy and dangerous. You don’t need them. You speak in code, or you just know.
You know where to get the right haircut, and you know the restaurants where you
can display the proper bottle of wine. (Drinking the wine is only ancillary to
the point.) You communicate through signals that you know what to do. That
gains you entrance to the closed circle, where honest, criminal language
ventures forth. Most of the time, the waiters don’t record it.
To call a poet a “parasite” in
the judgement of a court of law is power taken to such an arrogant extreme, and
an extreme of such entrenched, unshakeable confidence, that there’s no longer
any need for hiding. The point is not only to silence but to humiliate, and the
other point, just as critical, is to crow and spread. Judge Mme Saveleva, it
appears from B.’s accusation, did just that, and so a gentle poet bore the brunt
of power, was lined up in its bureaucratic crosshairs and took the bullet. For
poems.
I’ll quibble with B. on one thing
here: He asks that her name be remembered, in infamy and disgrace of course,
but remembered and reviled. No. Forget her name. Don’t forget what she did, and
don’t forget her victims. But forget her. I’ve forgotten her already. If one of
our recent men of power, as just one small representative and un-named example,
ever goes to prison, I will write him a long polite letter, outlining how I
feel about his war, his corporation, and the people who needlessly died because
of his leadership. And I will most definitely include a poem in that letter. I
do hope that he lives a long, long time, so that there is ample opportunity for
the interior state of his soul and his heart to become apparent across the
mismatched halves of his dishonest face. When his heart finally stops, then it
will be time to forget that he existed and we can relegate his banality to the
comforting emptiness of a particular forgetting.
Communism in the guise that
Berryman knew it, in the Soviet Union, has collapsed. It perpetuates for now in
other areas, but the USSR is gone. It does have thriving kin and spawn,
however. If poetry can teach as well as terrify and comfort, then so much the
better. But that’s why some tyrannies imprison poets. Terry Tempest Williams
writes about a protest she participated in. She had a pencil and notepad in her
pocket. “What are these?” the arresting officer asked. “Weapons,” she replied.
No comments:
Post a Comment