The poet Robert Lowell had given 77 Dream Songs a less-than-glowing
review, claiming that the reader often chafes at the Dream Songs’ obscurity and
“relentless indulgence.” Sometimes I would have to say I agree with this. Of
course I was about seven or eight at the time, so B. wouldn’t have cared about
my opinion then, and he’s dead now even though I’m not, yet, so my opinion now doesn’t
matter either (likely), but B. was stung by the accusation from Lowell. Thus,
DS 120 is a response to Lowell’s panning of the masterpiece.
Paranoia had become one of B.’s
operating modes, possibly brought on by relentless chemical modification of his
brain matter. He was still writing Dreams Songs at a feverish pace. Also, his
legacy mattered, I think, and it gave him a thin skin in response to bad
reviews from the poet colleagues upon whose high opinion he depended. Most were
obliging, because many of The Dream Songs are amazing. But I sympathize with all
that sensitivity. I’ve had the experience when one of the few times I felt I
was artistically hitting on all cylinders, someone came along and tried to
destroy the results. In my drawing class in college, I nailed the self-portrait
we were assigned. It was exhilarating to feel it flowing. I left it in the
studio overnight, and some self-appointed art critic defaced it. “This sucks”
he wrote across my face. Well, artists can be as conservative as anybody else, and
“conservative” in general, as far as I can tell, includes destroying anything
that threatens the conservative’s fantastical sense of rightness and decorum. Most
artists, or artistes, hide it by couching their conservatism inside a broader
avant-garde orthodoxy. Brian Wilson—a truly great and ground-breaking artist—had
a gathering of high-profile rock stars over to his studio, got everybody
stoned, and had them all singing complicated harmonic rounds of “Shortnin’
Bread”, which I think is a hoot. It think it was Iggy Pop who stormed out, fed
up with such ridiculous nonsense. I’ve always thought that story is hilarious: So
much for the crazed sensibilities of the freakazoid rock star. Break the mold
of his rock orthodoxy and he gets all sensitive about it—much like Santorum,
Huckabee, and Michelle Bachman: Cut from the same cloth, just woven in
different patterns.
I do wonder if The Dream Songs didn’t eventually settle
into their own self-styled orthodoxy. If such an orthodoxy were questioned at
all, then the conservative poet would lash out in defense. The genuine
innovator might not be so sensitive? That’s probably not fair. Blanket
statements about what to expect from an artist are narrowing in themselves, a
move on their own toward a critical orthodoxy. I can be shy, timid, unsure, clumsy,
and even stupid, but if I ever feel myself shading toward conservative, then it’s time to shake things up a bit.
♪ ♫
Mammy's little baby loves short'nin', short'nin', Mammy's little baby
loves short'nin' bread ♫
No comments:
Post a Comment