There is a subtitle: “(K’s first
administration seen in the light of the relevant history)”, but the relevant
history after his assassination seems to amount to little more than accusing
the government of being run by fools. And there are a pair of footnotes as
well, the second going off about lawyers, and, “1) Our contempt for our
government is mildly traditional, as represented by the communistic fascists
Mark Twain, Stephen Crane, Edmund Wilson, and other mad-dogs.”
It’s hard not to have some
sympathy for contempt of government these days, since it has become so
abundantly clear that elected officials, dependent as they are on a flow of
liquid cash to keep them situated, aren’t beholden to the people who actually
cast the votes that put them in office. It’s weird how money begets lies and lies
attract votes. The more cynical politicians have learned to count on it. So
they look upward to the money and take care of their daily business with that
mainly in mind, heads back, mouths open, with their faces bathed in torrents of
cash—the fundamental, supplicating pose. Meanwhile, as B. puts it, they “diarrhea
about Democracy.” “Diarrhea” as a verb is pretty good. It’s a vivid metaphor
and it completes the throughput: Money → lies → diarrhea. Then the diarrhea
attracts votes like flies. In one orifice and out the other, as it were. It’s a
nice contained alimentation. “I personally have voted Democratic all my life /
and hate foreign ideas.”
Sometimes you just have to snarl
it out, don’t you? I just got done with a day with a few unhappy moments,
though nothing of any consequence, or that wasn’t the same old crap. I just find
myself in a pissy mood over it. I’m resonating with this poem, too, and if I
get started on Republican Senators from the great Commonwealth of Kentucky, then
I’m likely to lose whatever readers I have left. It would be nice to have a
Pulitzer Prize behind me, which seems to me would give one the confidence and
authority to really let it fly. Call politicians fools, and the fools who vote
for them fools, and accuse talk of Democracy (remember the Cold War context) of
being just diarrhea. Communism was a foreign idea, since a German developed it
and a Russian twisted it enough to turn it into a bludgeon for dictatorship. But
B. doesn’t hate foreign ideas. That’s his persona, Henry’s, take on the world,
and Henry is cowering under some table, usually, berating himself and in this
case everyone around him with the most impolite phrases. He’s self-effacing,
but there’s a bitterness to it. If you see someone on the street talking to himself
these days, you just figure he has a phone in his ear. It used to be a clear
sign of madness, and these people were usually pretty angry. Now with fake
Internet personas, those are the people who go to the Web site of some online
news source they don’t agree with and berate all the ignorant people in the
comments section. If fame and accolades give you the confidence and authority
to speak your peace, so does anonymity, turns out. Henry is anonyme, and a persona, that’s clear enough, though the opacity
of the persona varies day to day, or more likely, he’s something to hide behind
in some ways, but there are windows in the persona where the real Berryman
pokes his head through and says something profound or outrageous or self-pitying.
We’re supposed to laugh about it.
Don't get me started on the successful trivializing of government by big business and entertainment news.
ReplyDelete